In This Issue

• Market-On-Close: All of last week’s market-moving news and macro context in under 5 minutes + futures-snapshots

• The Latest Investor Sentiment Readings

• Institutional Support & Resistance Levels For Major Indices: Exactly where to look for support and resistance this week in SPY, QQQ, IWM & DIA

• Institutional Activity By Sector: Institutional order flow by sector including the top institutionally-backed names in those sectors. We break it all down and provide the key insights and take-aways you need to navigate institutional positioning this week.

• Top Institutional Order Flow In Individual Names: All of the largest sweeps and blocks on lit exchanges and hidden dark pools

• Investments In Focus: Bull vs Bear arguments for SPOT, ENPH, PDD

• Top Institutionally-Backed Gainers & Losers: An explosive watchlist for day traders seeking high-volatility

• Normalized Performance By Thematics YTD (Sector, Industry, Factor, Energy, Metals, Currencies, and more): which corners of the markets are beating benchmarks, which ones are overlooked and which ones are over-crowded

• Key Econ Events and Earnings On-Deck For This Week

Market-On-Close

The past week in U.S. financial markets was a whirlwind of economic data releases, geopolitical concerns, and shifting investor sentiment. Stock indexes exhibited significant volatility, swinging between gains and losses before closing the week with modest recoveries. Inflation remained a focal point, with the Fed’s preferred gauge—the core Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) index—matching expectations but doing little to dispel uncertainty about future monetary policy. Meanwhile, bond yields fell to multi-month lows, reflecting a complex interplay of economic slowing, policy uncertainty, and investor risk aversion.

Markets React to Inflation Data and Growth Concerns

The S&P 500, Dow Jones Industrial Average, and Nasdaq 100 all ended the week higher after enduring turbulence. On Friday, the S&P 500 ($SPX) climbed 1.59%, the Dow Jones ($DOWI) gained 1.39%, and the Nasdaq 100 ($IUXX) advanced 1.62%. Futures markets also reflected optimism, with March E-mini S&P futures (ESH25) up 1.45% and March E-mini Nasdaq futures (NQH25) rising 1.47%.

Much of the relief rally stemmed from January’s core PCE data, which came in at 2.6% year-over-year—the lowest annualized increase in nearly four years. Investors viewed the data as an indication that the Federal Reserve may be on track to cut interest rates later this year, a sentiment further bolstered by declining Treasury yields. The benchmark 10-year T-note yield dropped to a 2.5-month low, providing support to equities.

However, the week was anything but smooth. A surprise decline in U.S. personal spending for January, down 0.2% month-over-month, raised concerns about consumer resilience. While personal income increased by 0.9%—the biggest jump in a year—the decline in spending suggested that Americans may be tightening their wallets in response to inflationary pressures and economic uncertainty.

Adding to the week’s drama, a meeting between former President Trump and Ukrainian President Zelensky was abruptly canceled due to disagreements, rekindling geopolitical tensions. Markets briefly turned lower on the news, highlighting how fragile sentiment remains.

Tariff Fears Resurface

Trade policy once again entered the spotlight as President Trump announced plans to impose 25% tariffs on Canada and Mexico starting March 4, along with an additional 10% tariff on China. Investors reacted negatively to the news, fearing that escalating trade barriers could weigh on global supply chains and corporate profit margins. Given that the previous round of tariffs during Trump’s first administration had far-reaching effects on markets, this latest announcement added another layer of uncertainty to an already jittery environment.

Tech Sector Struggles and a Shift in Market Leadership

One of the most notable themes of the past week was the underperformance of the so-called Magnificent 7—mega-cap tech stocks that have led the market higher over the past two years. With six of the seven companies lagging the broader market, their leadership appears to be waning. NVIDIA, widely regarded as a bellwether for artificial intelligence (AI), reported stellar earnings with a 78% revenue jump year-over-year, but its stock fell 8.5% as investors deemed the results as merely "good" rather than "extraordinary."

The sharp pullback in big tech has led to a broadening of market leadership, with sectors like health care, financials, and consumer staples showing relative strength. The S&P 500 Equal Weight Index (SPXEW), which assigns equal weighting to all index components, is up over 1% year-to-date, while the market-cap weighted S&P 500 has been flat.

Sentiment Takes a Hit

Investor and consumer sentiment soured further last week, reflecting heightened uncertainty around economic growth and inflation. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index for February dropped to 98.3, marking its sharpest monthly decline since August 2021.

Perhaps more concerning was the index’s expectations component, which fell below 80—a level historically associated with recessionary conditions. Inflation expectations also ticked higher, with survey respondents forecasting 6% price increases over the next year, up from 5.2% in January.

Bond Market Signals and Treasury Yields

While stocks wavered, the bond market painted a picture of growing economic caution. The 10-year Treasury yield fell to 4.19%, its lowest level in nearly three months, reflecting strong demand for safe-haven assets. The yield curve inversion between the 10-year and 3-month Treasuries—a closely watched recession indicator—deepened further, raising concerns about slowing growth.

Bitcoin and the Crypto Market Selloff

The crypto market was not immune to the week’s turbulence. Bitcoin tumbled 12% to $84,500, extending its February decline to 18%. The slide was driven by a combination of profit-taking, increased regulatory scrutiny, and broader risk-off sentiment in financial markets.

Earnings Scorecard: A Silver Lining?

Despite macroeconomic headwinds, corporate earnings continued to impress. With 95% of S&P 500 companies having reported Q4 results, aggregate earnings grew by 18%—the highest rate in three years. The financial sector led the charge with a 56% earnings gain, while other sectors such as industrials and consumer staples also delivered strong results. This earnings resilience suggests that, despite near-term market volatility, corporate America remains in good shape.

Looking Ahead: Volatility Likely to Persist

As markets head into March, several key questions remain unresolved:

• Will the Fed cut rates in 2025? Market pricing currently assigns only a 7% chance of a 25-basis-point cut at the next FOMC meeting, but expectations could shift if inflation continues to ease.

• How will trade policy evolve under the Trump administration? The threat of tariffs remains a wildcard that could disrupt supply chains and dampen investor confidence.

• Can the Magnificent 7 regain their leadership role? Or will markets continue to broaden out toward cyclical and value stocks?

Market history suggests that periods of volatility and sector rotation are normal components of long-term investing. While a correction of 10% or more has not occurred in over a year, the S&P 500’s sideways movement over the past three months may be acting as a stabilizing force. Investors who focus on balance and diversification may be better positioned to weather near-term market fluctuations while capturing long-term opportunities.

For now, uncertainty remains the dominant theme. But with inflation slowly easing, corporate earnings proving resilient, and monetary policy likely to remain accommodative, there are reasons to believe that the bull market still has room to run. The key, as always, will be navigating the noise and maintaining a disciplined, long-term investment approach.

5-Day Futures Performance Leaders

S&P 500 Sector Insights

Sector Overview With Individual Names By Market Cap

• Sharp Tech Sector Weakness: Technology stocks are experiencing significant declines, particularly in semiconductors with NVDA (-7.07%) and AVGO (-8.79%) showing substantial losses. Other major tech names like MSFT (-2.75%), AAPL (-1.51%), GOOG (-5.16%), and META (-2.25%) are also negative.

• Extreme Tesla Decline: TSLA shows a dramatic -13.27% drop, significantly underperforming even other negative sectors, suggesting company-specific issues beyond general market trends.

• Financial Sector Strength: Financial stocks are displaying remarkable resilience with Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B +7.33%), Visa (V +4.07%), and Mastercard (MA +3.37%) leading the gains. This indicates a potential sector rotation from growth to value.

• Healthcare Outperformance: Pharmaceutical companies like Eli Lilly (LLY +5.37%), Merck (MRK +3.07%), and AbbVie (ABBV +3.44%) are showing strong positive returns, reinforcing a shift toward defensive sectors.

• Consumer Defensive Strength: Companies like Walmart (WMT +4.04%), Procter & Gamble (PG +2.12%), and Home Depot (HD +2.93%) are performing well, further confirming the rotation to defensive and value-oriented names.

• Industrials Mixed Performance: This sector shows a mix of gains and losses with some aerospace & defense names like RTX (+7.07%) performing exceptionally well.

• Energy Stocks Resilient: Most energy names are holding up relatively well despite recent commodity price volatility, with companies like XOM (+0.88%) in positive territory.

• Clear Risk-Off Sentiment: The overall pattern shows investors moving away from high-growth, high-valuation technology stocks toward more stable, dividend-paying sectors like financials, healthcare, consumer staples, and utilities.

• Magnitude of Divergence: The stark contrast between the worst performers (deep red in tech) and best performers (bright green in financials/healthcare) suggests an unusually strong rotation.

• Market Breadth Concerns: While indexes may show modest declines, this heatmap reveals significant underlying weakness in large-cap tech names that have been market leaders, potentially signaling a shift in market leadership.

5-Day Sector Leaderboard

5-Day Individual Performance Grouped By Sector (Size By Market Cap)

ETF Insights

Reviewing a heatmap like this weekly can be incredibly helpful for investors as it provides a quick and visual summary of market performance across various sectors, asset classes, and geographies.

1. Sector and Asset Class Trends

• Identify Strong and Weak Sectors: Investors can quickly spot which sectors (e.g., technology, energy, healthcare) are performing well or underperforming.

• Asset Class Diversification: Seeing how commodities, fixed income, equities, and cryptocurrencies performed helps assess diversification.

2. Market Sentiment

• Risk-On or Risk-Off: A green-dominated map suggests bullish sentiment, while red indicates bearish sentiment. Investors can align their strategies accordingly.

• Volatility Indicators: Observing movements in volatility indices (e.g., VIX) can highlight changing market dynamics.

3. Regional Analysis

• Global Insights: Performance in developed and emerging markets (e.g., Europe, China, Asia-Pacific) helps in gauging international investment opportunities or risks.

• Currency Impacts: Movements in forex or country-specific ETFs can indicate currency-driven market trends.

4. Thematic Trends

• Growth vs. Value: Comparing the performance of growth ETFs (e.g., VUG) versus value ETFs (e.g., VTV) reveals the prevailing market preference.

• Industry Leadership: Highlighting leadership within industries (e.g., gold miners, semiconductors) can inform thematic plays.

5. Monitoring Investments

• Portfolio Alignment: Investors can track how their existing investments or watchlist align with broader market trends.

• Rotation Signals: Seeing week-over-week changes in sector dominance may signal sector rotation opportunities.

6. Risk Management

• Recognizing Overbought/Oversold Conditions: Consistent underperformance or overperformance in specific areas may indicate potential mean-reversion trades.

• Correlation Awareness: By observing how different asset classes move, investors can manage portfolio correlation and risk.

7. Decision Support

• Identify Outperformers/Underperformers: ETFs, sectors, or indices that repeatedly outperform or underperform can help refine trading or investment strategies.

• Macro Perspective: Weekly trends highlight macroeconomic or geopolitical influences affecting markets.

Regularly reviewing a heatmap like this is a strategic practice that supports data-driven decision-making while fostering a holistic understanding of market dynamics.

• Technology sector is experiencing significant pressure, with major tech ETFs showing substantial losses:

  • SMH (Semiconductor ETF): -6.89%

  • XLK (Technology Select Sector): -3.98%

  • SOXX (iShares Semiconductor): -6.90%

  • SOXL (Leveraged Semiconductor): -21.10%

• Fixed Income and Bonds are performing well, providing a safe haven:

  • TLT (Long-Term Treasury): +3.15%

  • IEF (7-10 Year Treasury): +1.72%

  • BND (Total Bond Market): +1.23%

  • AGG (Aggregate Bond): +1.25%

• Financial sector shows resilience amid market volatility:

  • XLF (Financial Select Sector): +2.82%

  • SOxs (Direxion Financial Bull): +21.02%

  • KRE (Regional Banks): +1.06%

• Real Estate and Utilities are performing relatively well:

  • VNQ (Vanguard Real Estate): +2.72%

  • IYR (iShares Real Estate): +2.22%

  • XLU (Utilities Select Sector): +1.31%

• Commodity-related ETFs are broadly negative:

  • GLD (Gold): -2.76%

  • SLV (Silver): -4.93%

  • USO (Crude Oil): -13.07%

  • UNG (Natural Gas): -9.80%

• Cryptocurrency ETFs show significant losses:

  • IBIT (Bitcoin ETF): -11.16%

  • FBTC (Fidelity Bitcoin): -11.24%

  • BITO (ProShares Bitcoin): -11.02%

• Global and emerging markets are struggling:

  • EEM (Emerging Markets): -3.76%

  • EWZ (Brazil): -5.34%

  • YINN (China Bull 3X): -9.23%

  • FXI (China Large-Cap): -2.79%

• Healthcare sector is outperforming technology:

  • XLV (Healthcare Select Sector): +1.71%

• Inverse ETFs are positive, reflecting market declines:

  • SQQQ (Inverse NASDAQ): +10.41%

  • SDS (UltraShort S&P 500): +2.11%

• Major index ETFs show modest losses:

  • SPY (S&P 500): -0.96%

  • QQQ (NASDAQ): -3.40%

  • IWM (Russell 2000): -1.65%

Global Overview

Foreign ADR stocks listed on NYSE, NASDAQ & AMEX categorized by geographic location. Reviewing a global heatmap like this weekly is valuable for investors because it offers insights into international markets, helping to:

1. Identify Global Trends: Spot which regions or countries are performing well or underperforming.

2. Assess Sector and Regional Performance: Understand how industries are faring across different regions.

3. Diversify Portfolios: Uncover opportunities in emerging or developed markets for greater diversification.

4. Gauge Global Sentiment: Recognize the impact of macroeconomic events on specific regions.

5. Align with Global Strategies: Refine investment strategies based on regional strengths or weaknesses.

This overview ensures investors stay informed about global opportunities and risks, complementing their domestic market analysis.

• Asia, particularly Taiwan, is experiencing significant downward pressure, with TSM (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing) showing a substantial decline of -8.93%. This is notable as TSM has a large market cap indicated by its box size.

• The technology sector appears to be under pressure globally, with companies like ASML (-3.82%) in the Netherlands, and Chinese tech firms like BABA (Alibaba, -7.82%) and PDD (PinDuoDuo, -13.44%) showing significant losses.

• There's a clear regional pattern in Europe, where companies are showing mixed but generally modest performance, with more balanced distribution between gains and losses.

• Japan seems to be performing relatively better than China, with companies like SONY (+1.05%) and MUFG (+0.71%) in positive territory.

• In South America, commodity-focused companies like VALE (-6.73%) in Brazil are showing notable declines.

• The Australian market is dominated by BHP (-5.75%), suggesting resource stocks may be under pressure.

• The financial sector shows mixed results across regions, with some banks like UBS (+2.43%) performing positively while others struggle.

• The largest market cap losses appear concentrated in semiconductors and tech, particularly in Asia (TSM, ASML).

• Green spots (positive performers) are more evenly distributed across regions but generally represent smaller market caps than some of the notable red boxes.

• North American companies shown (Canadian and some US-listed ADRs) display mixed but somewhat more positive performance compared to Asian counterparts.

US Investor Sentiment

Insider Trading

Insider trading occurs when a company’s leaders or major shareholders trade stock based on non-public information. Tracking these trades can reveal insider expectations about the company’s future. For example, large purchases before an earnings report or drug trial results might indicate confidence in upcoming good news.

%Bull-Bear Spread

The %Bull-Bear Spread chart is a sentiment indicator that shows the difference between the percentage of bullish and bearish investors, often derived from surveys or sentiment data, such as the AAII (American Association of Individual Investors) sentiment survey. This spread tells investors about the prevailing mood in the market and can provide insights into market extremes and potential turning points.

1. Bullish or Bearish Sentiment:

   • When the spread is positive, it means more investors are bullish than bearish, indicating optimism about the market’s direction.

   • A negative spread indicates more bearish sentiment, meaning more investors expect the market to decline.

2. Contrarian Indicator:

   • The %Bull-Bear Spread is often used as a contrarian indicator. For example, extremely high levels of bullish sentiment might suggest that the market is overly optimistic and could be due for a correction.

   • Similarly, when bearish sentiment is extremely high, it might indicate that the market is overly pessimistic, and a rally could be on the horizon.

3. Market Extremes and Reversals:

   • Historically, extreme values of the spread (both positive and negative) can signal turning points in the market. A very high positive spread can signal market exuberance, while a very low or negative spread may indicate fear or capitulation.

NAAIM Exposure Index

The NAAIM Exposure Index (National Association of Active Investment Managers Exposure Index) measures the average exposure to U.S. equity markets as reported by its member firms. These are typically active money managers who provide their equity exposure levels weekly. The index offers insight into how much these managers are investing in equities at any given time, ranging from being fully short (-100%) to leveraged long (up to +200%).

AAII Investor Sentiment Survey

The AAII Investor Sentiment Survey is a weekly survey conducted by the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) to gauge the mood of individual investors regarding the direction of the stock market over the next six months. It provides insights into whether investors are feeling bullish (expecting the market to rise), bearish (expecting the market to fall), or neutral (expecting the market to stay about the same).

Key Points:

• Bullish Sentiment: Reflects the percentage of investors who believe the stock market will rise in the next six months.

• Bearish Sentiment: Represents those who expect a decline.

• Neutral Sentiment: Reflects investors who anticipate little to no market movement.

The survey is widely followed as a contrarian indicator, meaning that extreme levels of bullishness or bearishness can sometimes signal market turning points. For example, when a large number of investors are overly optimistic (high bullish sentiment), it could suggest a market top, while excessive pessimism (high bearish sentiment) may indicate a market bottom is near.

SPX Put/Call Ratio

The SPX Put/Call Ratio is an indicator that is used to gauge market sentiment. This is calculated as the ratio between trading S&P 500 put options and S&P call options. A high put/call ratio can indicate fear in the markets, while a low ratio indicates confidence. For example, in 2015, the Put-Call ratio was as high as 3.77 because of market fears stemming from various global economic issues like a GDP growth slowdown in China and a Greek debt default.

CBOE Equity Put/Call Ratio

The CBOE (Chicago Board Options Exchange) equity put/call ratio is a sentiment indicator used by traders and analysts to gauge market sentiment and potential shifts in investor behavior. It is calculated by dividing the volume of put options by the volume of call options on equities. Here’s what it reveals and how it is generally interpreted:

• High Put/Call Ratio: When the put/call ratio is high (above 1.0), it suggests that there is more demand for put options than call options. This typically reflects a more bearish sentiment, as investors may be hedging against potential declines or expecting the market to fall.

• Low Put/Call Ratio: Conversely, a low put/call ratio (below 0.7) indicates a higher volume of call options compared to puts, reflecting bullish sentiment. Investors may be expecting upward momentum and are positioning themselves to profit from price gains

ISEE Sentiment Index

The ISEE (International Securities Exchange Sentiment) Index is a measure of investor sentiment derived from options trading. Unlike traditional put/call ratios, the ISEE Index focuses only on opening long customer transactions and is adjusted to remove market-maker and firm trades, providing a purer sentiment reading.

The ISEE Index typically ranges from 0 to 200, with readings above 100 indicating more call options being bought relative to put options, suggesting bullish sentiment. Conversely, readings below 100 suggest bearish sentiment, with more puts being purchased relative to calls.

New Highs - New Lows

The New Highs - New Lows indicator (NH-NL) displays the daily difference between the number of stocks reaching new 52-week highs and the number of stocks reaching new 52-week lows. The NH-NL indicator generally reaches its extreme lows slightly before a major market bottom. As the market then turns up from the major bottom, the indicator jumps up rapidly. During this period, many new stocks are making new highs because it's easy to make a new high when prices have been depressed for a long time. The NH-NL indicator oscillates around zero. If the indicator is positive, the bulls are in control. If it is negative, the bears are in control. As the cycle matures, a divergence often occurs as fewer and fewer stocks are making new highs (the indicator falls), yet the market indices continue to reach new highs. This is a classic bearish divergence that indicates that the current upward trend is weak and may reverse.

ARMS Index

The Arms Index, also known as the TRIN (Short-Term TRading INdex), was developed by Richard Arms in the 1960s. It is calculated by dividing the ratio of advancing stocks to declining stocks by the ratio of advancing volume to declining volume. Interpreting the Arms Index involves looking at its value in relation to certain thresholds. A value below "1" is considered bullish, indicating that advancing stocks and volume dominate the market. Conversely, a value above "1" is considered bearish, suggesting that declining stocks and volume are more prevalent. Extremely low values (below 0.5) or high values (above 2) are often seen as potential reversal signals.

S&P Breadth

Breadth, in the context of stock market analysis, refers to the measure of how many stocks in a given index (such as the S&P 500) are participating in a trend, such as advancing or declining relative to a certain moving average (e.g., 50-day or 200-day).

1. Market Strength Assessment:

   • Breadth provides insight into whether a market rally or decline is broad-based or driven by only a few large-cap stocks. A rally supported by a high percentage of stocks above their 50-day or 200-day averages is generally considered healthier and more sustainable.

2. Early Warning Signals:

   • Divergences between breadth indicators and the index price can signal potential reversals. For example:

     • If the index is rising, but the number of stocks above their moving averages is declining, it may indicate weakening underlying strength and potential for a pullback.

     • Conversely, if breadth improves while the index remains flat or declines, it may suggest accumulating strength for a future rally.

3. Trend Confirmation:

   • Breadth indicators can confirm trends. For instance, a strong majority of stocks above their moving averages signals robust market momentum, providing confidence in the prevailing trend.

4. Identifying Overbought or Oversold Conditions:

   • Extremely high or low breadth readings can signal overbought or oversold conditions, which might lead to mean reversion. For example:

     • If nearly all stocks are above their 50-day or 200-day averages, it may suggest overbought conditions.

     • Conversely, extremely low levels indicate oversold conditions and potential for a bounce.

Breadth and Timing Investments:

1. Entry Points:

   • When breadth improves (e.g., more stocks move above their 50-day or 200-day moving averages) after a market pullback, it can indicate a good time to start building positions as the broader market is regaining strength.

2. Exit Points:

   • Breadth deterioration during a rally may suggest it’s time to reduce exposure, especially if only a small number of stocks are driving index gains. This is often a warning sign of an impending correction.

3. Volatility and Risk Management:

   • Weak breadth in volatile markets may prompt caution or defensive positioning. Conversely, improving breadth can justify taking on more risk during uptrends.

CME Fedwatch

What is the likelihood that the Fed will change the Federal target rate at upcoming FOMC meetings, according to interest rate traders? Use CME FedWatch to track the probabilities of changes to the Fed rate, as implied by 30-Day Fed Funds futures prices.

CNN Fear & Greed Constituent Data Points & Composite Index

Institutional S/R Levels for Major Indices

When you’re a large institutional player, your primary goal is to find liquidity - places to do a ton of business with the least amount of slippage possible. VolumeLeaders.com automatically identifies and visually plots the exact spots where institutions are doing business and where they are likely to return for more. It’s one of the primary reasons “support” and “resistance” concepts work and truly one of the reasons “price has memory”.

Levels from the VolumeLeaders.com platform can help you formulate trades theses about:

• Where to add or take profit

• Where to de-risk or hedge

• What strikes to target for options

• Where to expect support or resistance

And this is just a small sample; there are countless ways to leverage this information into trades that express your views on the market. The platform covers thousands of tickers on multiple timeframes to accommodate all types of traders.

SPY 0.06%↑

After selling off from the $610 area in mid‐February, SPY found support near $585–$590, where strong institutional activity helped stem the decline. The recent bounce has lifted price back to the mid‐$590s, but it remains below heavier overhead supply in the $600–$605 zone. If buyers can maintain momentum and push SPY above $600, a run toward the prior swing high near $610 is possible. Conversely, a failure to break that ceiling—or a slip back beneath $590—would indicate renewed selling pressure, increasing the odds of revisiting February’s lows in the mid‐$580s.

QQQ 0.03%↑

QQQ suffered a sharp February decline from the mid‐$530s down to the $500 level, where strong buying interest finally emerged. The recent rebound has lifted price back toward the $505–$510 region, but significant overhead supply still looms around $515–$520, where prior institutional trades suggest sellers may step in.

If QQQ can continue holding above $505 and push back into the $515–$520 zone on strong volume, it would indicate that buyers have absorbed a good portion of the recent selling pressure, potentially fueling a more sustained recovery. However, a failure to clear that overhead band—or a slip back under $500—would signal that bears remain firmly in control, raising the prospect of revisiting or even undercutting February’s lows.

IWM 0.00%↑

IWM fell sharply below key support near $220 in late February, but recently found buying interest in the $215–$216 zone, prompting a modest rebound. Price is now hovering just above $214–$215, still well under the heavier overhead supply around $220–$222, where the ETF previously struggled to maintain gains.

If buyers can push IWM back above $220 and hold it there, it would signal a potential trend reversal, with scope to retest the mid‐$220s. However, failure to clear that resistance—or a slip back below $215—would underscore that sellers remain in control, raising the probability of a renewed decline toward recent lows.

DIA 0.00%↑

DIA bounced sharply off the $430–$432 zone at the end of the month and is now attempting to reclaim lost ground above $435. However, notable overhead supply remains in the $440–$445 region, where previous institutional trades may still cap further upside. If buyers can push DIA convincingly above $445, it would open the door for a retest of prior highs in the mid‐$450s. Conversely, a rejection near $440–$445—especially if price slips back under $435—would signal that sellers remain active, raising the likelihood of another move toward the recent lows near $430.

Institutional Order Flow

Rolling 90-Day Dollars By Day

This chart shows institutional activity by dollars by day on a rolling 1-year basis. From a theoretical standpoint, examining a chart of daily institutional dollar activity over the course of a year can offer several insights and possible inferences, though all should be approached with caution since the data alone may not prove causality or confirm underlying reasons. Some potential takeaways include:

1. Event-Driven Behavior:
   Sharp, singular spikes on certain days might correlate with major market-moving events. These could include central bank policy announcements, significant geopolitical news, sudden macroeconomic data releases (like employment reports or GDP data), earnings seasons for large-cap companies, or unexpected shocks (e.g., mergers, acquisitions, regulatory changes).

2. Liquidity Dynamics:
   Institutions often concentrate large trades on days with higher expected liquidity. For instance, heightened activity might coincide with index reconstitutions, option expiration dates, or the days leading up to or following a major index rebalance, when large amounts of capital shift hands simultaneously.

3. Risk Management and Hedging Activity:
   Institutions may significantly adjust their exposures on days that are critical from a risk management perspective. Large spikes can occur if hedge funds, pension funds, or asset managers are rolling over futures contracts, initiating or closing out large hedges, or reacting to volatility triggers.

4. Market Sentiment Indicators:
   While the data is purely transactional, the sheer volume of institutional involvement on certain days might indirectly hint at changing sentiment or strategic shifts.

In essence, a chart like this can lead you to hypothesize that institutional trading volumes are not constant or random but rather influenced by a mix of predictable calendar effects, major market events, liquidity considerations, risk management decisions, and strategic allocation shifts.

Top Institutional Order Flow By Sector By Week For The Past 90-Days

1. In the most recent weeks (weeks 6-8 of 2025), there's been a steady increase in institutional activity across most sectors after a period of lower volume in late January (weeks 3-5).

2. Technology sector (dark blue bars) shows consistent institutional participation throughout the period, but appears to have relatively decreased in the most recent weeks compared to its dominance in earlier periods. The decreased appetite for tech was some of the most important foreshadowing of the recent drawdown. Renewed interest comes mixed-in with EOM/BOM flows but the relative increase is still significant and necessary for those seeking at least a bounce in indices.

3. Financial Services (purple) has maintained steady institutional interest and shows proportionally stronger representation in recent weeks.

4. Healthcare (light blue) displays increasing institutional volume over the last 2-3 weeks, potentially indicating sector rotation toward more defensive positions.

5. Energy sector (red) shows minimal institutional volume throughout the period, reflecting its smaller market weighting and possibly lower institutional interest.

6. The latest data (far right bars) shows a balanced distribution across sectors with notable participation in Large Caps, Technology, Financials, and Industrials, suggesting institutions may be maintaining diversified exposure rather than making concentrated sector bets.

7. The recent balanced sector allocation pattern suggests institutional investors may be positioning more neutrally after the volatility observed in prior charts, neither aggressively bullish nor bearish on any particular sector.

This institutional flow data, when viewed alongside the SPY price action and large block trades from VL indicates cautious positioning by large investors with some defensive rotation but no extreme sector positioning that would signal strong directional conviction.

Top Institutional Order Flow In Equities

These are incredibly important charts to watch as they contains lots of nuanced suggestions at a thematic level. Watch these charts closely week-to-week to stay informed about where institutional money is flowing, adjust your strategies based on momentum, align your portfolio with macroeconomic and market trends, and manage risks more effectively by avoiding sectors losing institutional favor.

• Sector Rotation Insights: The chart highlights which sectors are attracting institutional activity and which are losing favor. Institutions often lead market trends, so tracking shifts in their focus can indicate sector rotations.

• Sentiment Analysis: The level of institutional activity reflects confidence in specific sectors. Rising activity in traditionally defensive sectors (e.g., healthcare, utilities) may indicate caution, while a surge in growth sectors (e.g., technology, consumer discretionary) could suggest optimism.

• Emerging Trends: Sudden spikes in a previously overlooked sector, like industrials or consumer staples, might hint at emerging opportunities or structural shifts.

• Macro Themes: Changes in sector activity often align with broader macroeconomic themes like inflation, interest rates, or geopolitical events. For instance:

  • Increased activity in energy might indicate concerns about oil supply or rising prices.

  • Growth in technology could align with innovations or favorable policies.

• Risk Management: Declining institutional activity in a sector might signal weakening fundamentals or heightened risks.

• Spotting Overcrowding: Excessive activity in a single sector over multiple weeks may suggest overcrowding, which could lead to heightened volatility if institutions begin to exit.

Many excellent trade ideas and sources of inspiration can be found in these prints below. While only the top 30 from each group are displayed, the complete results are accessible in VolumeLeaders.com for you to explore at your convenience any time. Remember to configure trade alerts within the platform to ensure institutional order flows that capture your interest or are significant to you aren’t missed. The blue charts encompass all types of trades, including blocks on lit exchanges; the purple charts exclusively depict dark pool trades; and the green charts represent sweeps only.

Top Institutional Order Flow In ETFs

Last Week’s Institutionally-Backed Gainers & Losers

If you’re going to bet on a name, consider one that is officially endorsed by an institution! These are the top percent gainers (green) and percent losers (red) from this week’s open-to-close that had a trade price greater than $20 and institutional involvement. Continue watching tickers from this and prior stacks as these names frequently turn into multi-leg trades with a lot of movement!

Last Week’s Billion-Dollar Prints

Tickers that printed a trade worth at least $1B last week get a special shout-out. These are massive commitments by institutions that should not be ignored.